Jonathan
Edwards' Apologetics
|
|
Laatst bijgewerkt op
5 september 2008. Jonathan Edwards Pagina ![]() |
PART I.OBSERVATIONS ON THE FACTS AND EVIDENCES OF CHRISTIANITY, AND THE OBJECTIONS OF INFIDELS.CHAPTER I General observations.§1. I suppose it will be acknowledged by the deists, that the Christian religion is the most rational and pure that ever was established in any society of men; and that they will except only themselves, as serving God in a manner more according to his will, than the christian manner. But can any believe that God has so wholly thrown away mankind, that there never yet has been a society of men that have rightly paid respect to their Creator? It is
easily proved that the highest end and happiness of man is to view
God’s excellency, to love him, and receive
expressions of his love. This love, including all those other
affections which depend upon, and are necessarily connected with it, we
express in worship. The highest end of society among men, therefore,
must be, to assist and join with each other in this employment. But how
comes it to pass, that this end of society was never yet obtained among
deists? Where was ever any social worship statedly performed by them.
And were they disposed socially to express their love and honour, which
way would they go about it? They have nothing from God to direct them.
Doubtless there would be perpetual dissensions about it, unless they
were disposed to fall in with the Christian model. We may be convinced,
therefore, that revelation is necessary to right social worship. §
2. There never was any religion but that which we profess, and those
formed from it, that pretended to inform us of the nature of God, that
there is but one God; how the world came into being, and how God
governs it. What other religion discovered God’s great designs; what is
his will, and how he should be served? declared the reward of obedience
and punishment of disobedience; the nature of man’s happiness, and the
end for which he was made? that gave us good moral rules; told us what
will become of the world hereafter; explained how we came to be sinful
and miserable, and how we may escape sin and misery? gave an account of
the great revolutions of the world, and the successions of God’s works
in the universe; and where his true worshippers have been, and what has
befallen them; or informed us how the world came to apostatize from the
true worship of God? Christianity is the only religion that ever
pretended that there should a time come, when it should be the religion
of the world in general. §
3. The Jewish religion, as at present professed, most certainly differs
from what reason evidently declares to be the essence of religion. It
does not state aright the highest end and happiness of man, his chief
business and greatest misery, and the true worship of God. Undoubtedly
the Messiah was to come to advance the best interest and true happiness
of mankind, which certainly consist in what the gospel declares our
Jesus advanced, and not in what the Jews expect the Messiah will do. §
4. I think it certain, that seeing the miracles of Christ were done,
for three years and a half, so publicly all over Judea; and seeing
there was such violent opposition there, so soon after, against the
Christians; if the matters of fact had been false, they would have been
denied by the Jews generally; and if this had been the case, we should
have known it. The Jews afterwards would much more have denied them;
which it is evident they did not. If they had, they would have been
also denied by the heathens who wrote against the Christians. But they
were not denied. It is impossible that the whole world should have
turned Christian, in three hundred years after the facts were so
publicly done, if they had been generally false. If the Jews had denied
the matters of fact at first, they would undoubtedly have denied them
at this day, seeing they are so tenacious of the traditions of their
fathers. Christ’s resurrection was openly published within a few days
after his death, on the day of Pentecost. It is undoubted, that the
number of the Christians increased every where exceedingly from that
time; so that a considerable alteration was speedily made by it in the
face of the world. Whether the matters of fact were written or no, they
were universally talked of. The conversion of the Roman empire to the
Christian religion, was the most remarkable thing that ever happened
among the nations of the world; and it would be unaccountable that it
should have happened upon the story of a few obscure men, without
inquiring into the matters related. § 5. I am convinced of the
necessity of a revelation, considering how negligent, dull, and
careless about a future happiness, I should be, if I was left to
discover that happiness by unassisted reason: especially if there were
no revelation at all, about what is pleasing to God; how he accepts our
services; after what manner he loves his servants; how he will pardon
sin, &c. §
6. It is certain that Jesus Christ had none of the advantages of
education, to get learning and knowledge; and it is also certain, that
every where in his speeches, he showed an uncommon insight into things,
a great knowledge of the true nature of virtue and morality, and what
was most acceptable to God, vastly beyond the rest of the nation take
scribes and Pharisees and all. And how did he come by it? how did he
get it at Nazareth? Those who have not an education in these days, may
get much by books, which are so common: but books of learning were not
to be had then. Yea, it is evident that he knew vastly more than any of
the philosophers and wise men in the whole world, by those rational
descriptions which he gave of God and his attributes; of his government
and providence; and of man’s nature, business, end, and happiness; of
what is pleasing to God; of the immortality of the soul, and a future
state. How knew he, so exactly, truths perhaps demonstrable by reason,
but never found out before? &c. §
7. That Christ was really dead, appears from many considerations. It is
very unreasonable to imagine, that he feigned himself dead; for what
reason had he to think that he should have success, if he did? or to
expect they would take him down before he was quite dead? Or, if he had
had such a design, it was impossible that he should act his part so
accurately, as not to be discovered or suspected. Besides, if he was
not dead when they took him down from the cross, he was very near it;
and no doubt but his grievous wounds, the loss of blood, and fasting so
long, would have extinguished his life before the third day. And if
then he only rose out of a swoon, how came he perfectly sound at once?
Doubtless, his hands and feet were much torn by bearing his weight so
long on iron spikes driven through them. And if he rose from the dead
in no supernatural sense, whither did he go when he rose? What became
of him? We have no account of his dying again; nor was he yet to be
found after a few weeks. §
8. If Christianity was not true, it would never afford so much matter
for rational and penetrating minds to be exercised upon. If it were
false, such minds would find it empty, and it would be a force upon the
intellect to be set upon meditating upon that which has no
other order, foundation, and mutual dependence to be discovered in its
parts, than what is accidental. A strong and piercing mind would feel
itself exceedingly bound and hindered. But in fact, there is the like
liberty in the study of Christianity, and as much improvement of the
mind, as in the study of natural philosophy, or any study whatsoever;
yea, a great deal more. And whatever may be said about Mahometan
divinity, I cannot be convinced but that a mind that has the faculty
and habit of clear and distinct reasoning, would find nothing but
chains, fetters, and confusion, if it should pretend to fix its reason
upon it. §
9. Seeing the beauty of the corporeal world consists chiefly in
representing spiritual beauties, and the beauties of minds are
infinitely the greatest; we therefore may conclude, that God, when
he created the world, showed his own perfection and beauties far the
most charmingly and clearly, in the spiritual part of the world. But
seeing spiritual beauty consists principally in virtue and holiness;
and seeing there is so little of this beauty to be seen now on earth;
hence we may fairly conclude, that there has been a great fall and
defection in this part of the spiritual world, from its primitive
beauty and charms. Corollary.
Seeing this is so agreeable to the account that the Christian
religion gives of the matter; and seeing it is evident, from many
arguments, that God intends not to give over man as lost, but has a
merciful intention of restoring him to his primitive beauty; and seeing
we are told this, and the manner of it, in the christian religion
alone; and seeing the account is so rational; it is a great
confirmation of the truth of Christianity. § 10. It is a convincing argument for the truth of the Christian religion, and that it stands upon a most sure basis, that none have ever yet been able to prove it false, though there have been many men of all sorts, many fine wits and men of great learning, that have spent themselves, and ransacked the world, for arguments against it, and this for many ages.
When a person appears, that has evidently the whole course of nature at all times subject to his command, so that he can alter it how and when he pleases, we have the greatest reason to think that person has divine authority, and that the author and upholder of nature favours him, and gives approbation to what he pretends thereby. For we know, that the course of nature is God’s established course of acting upon creatures; and we cannot think that he would give power to any evil spirit to alter it when he pleases, for evil purposes. But Christ manifestly had the course of nature so subject to his will and command.
If there never had been any revelation, I believe the world would have been full of endless disputes about the very being of a God; whether the world was from eternity or not; and whether the form and order of the world did not result from the mere nature of matter. Ten thousand different schemes there would have been about it And if it were allowed that there was a first cause of all things, there would have been endless disputes, and abundance of uncertainty, to determine what son of a thing that first cause was. Some, it may be, would have thought that it was properly an intelligent mind and a voluntary agent. Others might say, that it was some principle of things, of which we could have no kind of ideas. Some would have called it a voluntary agent; some, a principle exerting itself by a natural necessity. There might have been many schemes contrived about this, and some would like one best, and some another; and amongst those that held, that the original of all things was superior intelligence and will, there probably would have been everlasting doubts and disputes, whether there was one only, or more. Some perhaps would have said, there was but one; some that there were two; the one the principle of good, the other the principle of evil: others, that there was a society, or a world of them. And among those that held that there was but one mind, there would be abundance of uncertainty what sort of a being he was; whether he was good or evil; whether he was just or unjust; holy or wicked; gracious or cruel; or whether he was partly good, and partly evil; and how far he concerned himself with the world, after he had made it; and how far things were owing to his providence, or whether at all; how far he concerned himself with mankind; what was pleasing to him in them, and what was displeasing; or whether he cared any thing about it, whether he delighted in justice and order or not; and whether he would reward the one, and punish the other; and how, and when, and where, and to what degree. There would have been abundance of doubt and dispute concerning what this mind expected from us, and how we should behave towards him; or whether he expected we should anywise concern ourselves with him: whether we ever ought to apply ourselves to him any way; whether we ought to speak to him, as expecting that he would take any notice of us: how we should show our respect to him; whether we ought to praise and commend him in our addresses; whether we ought to ask that of him which we need; whether or no he would forgive any, after they had offended him; when they had reason to think they were forgiven, and what they should do that they might be forgiven; and whether it is ever worth the while for them that are so often offending, to try for it; whether there were not some sins so great, that God never would upon any terms forgive them, and how great they must be in order to that. Men would be exceedingly at a loss to know when they were in favour with him, and upon what terms they could be in his favour. They would be in a dreadful uncertainty about a future state; whether there be any, and, if there be, whether it is a state of rewards and punishments; and if it is, what kind of state it is, and how men are to be rewarded and punished, to what degree, and how long; whether man’s soul be eternal or not; and if it be, whether it is to remain in another world in a fixed state, or change often. Every man would plead for the lawfulness of this or that practice, just as suited his fancy, and agreed with his interest and appetites; and there would be room for a great deal of uncertainty and difference of opinion among those that were most speculative and impartial. There would be uncertainty, in a multitude of instances, what was just, and what unjust. It would be very uncertain how far self-interest should govern men, and how far love to our neighbour; how far revenge would be right, and whether or no a man might hate his neighbour, and for what causes: what degree of passion and ambition was justifiable and laudable: what sensual enjoyments were lawful, and what not: how far we ought to honour, respect, and submit to our parents, and other superiors: how far it would be lawful to dissemble and deceive. It seems to me, there would be infinite confusion in these things; and that there would hardly be any such thing as conscience in the world. The world has had a great deal of experience of the necessity of a revelation; we may see it in all ages, that have been without a revelation. In what gross darkness and brutal stupidity have such places, in these matters, always been overwhelmed! and how many, and how great and foolish mistakes, and what endless uncertainty and differences of opinion, have there been among the most learned and philosophical! Yet there never was a real trial how it would be with mankind in this respect, without having any thing from revelation. I believe that most of those parts of natural religion, that were held by the heathens before Christ, were owing to tradition from those of their forefathers who had the light of revelation. And many of those being most evidently agreeable to reason, were more easily upheld and propagated. Many of their wise men who had influence and rule over them, saw their rectitude and agreeableness to reason better than others. Some of them travelled much, and those things which appeared most agreeable to their reason, they transplanted to their own country. Judea was a sort of light among the nations, though they did not know it. The practice and principles of that country kept the neighbouring nations in remembrance of traditions, which they had from their forefathers; and so kept them from degenerating so much as otherwise they would have done. In fact, the philosophers had the foundation of most of their truths, from the ancients, or from the Phœnicians, or what they picked up here and there of the relics of revelation. How came all the heathen nations to agree in the custom of sacrificing? The light of nature did not teach it them; without doubt they had it from tradition; and therefore, it needs not seem strange, that what of natural religion they had amongst them, came the same way. I am persuaded, that mankind would have been like a herd of beasts, with respect to their knowledge in all important truths, if there never had been any such thing as revelation in the world; and that they never would have risen out of their brutality. We see, that those who live at the greatest distance from revelation, are far the most brutish. The heathens in America, and in some of the utmost parts of Asia and Africa, are far more barbarous than those who formerly lived in Rome, Greece, Egypt, Syria, and Chaldea. Their traditions are more worn out, and they are more distant from places enlightened with revelation. The Chinese, descended probably from the subjects of Noah, that holy man, have held more by tradition from him, than other nations, and so have been a more civilized people. The increase of learning and philosophy in the Christian world, is owing to revelation. The doctrine of revealed religion are the foundation of all useful and excellent knowledge. The word of God leads barbarous nations into the way of using their understandings. It brings their minds into a way of reflecting and abstracted reasoning; and delivers from uncertainly in the first principles, such as, the being of God, the dependence of all things upon him, being subject to his influence and providence, and being ordered by his wisdom. Such principles as these are the basis of all true philosophy, as appears more and more as philosophy improves. Revelation delivers mankind from that distraction and confusion, which discourages all attempts to improve in knowledge. Revelation actually gives men a most rational account of religion and morality, and the highest philosophy, and all the greatest things that belong to learning concerning God, the world, human nature, spirits, providence, time, and eternity. Revelation not only gives us the foundation and first principles of all learning, but it gives us the end, the only end, that would be sufficient to move man to the pursuit. Revelation redeems nations from a vicious, sinful, and brutish way of living, which will effectually keep out learning. It is therefore unreasonable to suppose, that philosophy might supply the defect of revelation. Knowledge is easy to us that understand by revelation; but we do not know what brutes we should have been, if there never had been any revelation.
If God expects that we shall receive any New Testament at all, we must suppose that God’s providence would be concerned in this matter. God took this care with respect to the books of the Old Testament, that no books should be received by the Jewish church, and delivered down in the canon of the Old Testament, but what were his word, and owned by Christ. We may therefore conclude, that he would still take the same care of his church, with respect to the New Testament.
It is a confirmation that God designed the Christian religion should succeed the Jewish; that, speedily after the introduction of the christian religion, God, in his providence, by the destruction of the temple, and dispersion of the Jewish nation, made that religion impracticable. It was prophesied of old, that God should be acknowledged and worshipped by other nations, and that other nations were to be God’s people. Therefore there was a religion to succeed the Jewish, very different as to external worship; because the Jewish religion was not fitted for more than a single nation; nor is it practicable by the world in general. But the Christian religion is exceedingly fitted for universal practice.
|